" When it comes to fighting for progress in Boston, there’s a long history of people in power trying to label advocacy and hard work as being political in order to avoid accountability and distract from community demands for better leadership. "
- Michelle Wu

In Boston, there is a long-standing pattern where those in positions of authority tend to dismiss or marginalize efforts by community members who advocate for change and improvements as being overly political. This tactic serves to deflect attention away from their own responsibilities and shortcomings, allowing them to avoid direct accountability.

At its core, this statement highlights the strategic use of language by powerful individuals to undermine grassroots movements and civic engagement. By categorizing sincere attempts at social improvement as "political," leaders can justify ignoring or opposing such initiatives without addressing the underlying issues. This approach not only silences critics but also weakens community solidarity by fostering distrust in local governance. It reflects a broader concern about how political discourse is manipulated to maintain the status quo and prevent meaningful progress.

Michelle Wu, who made this statement, is a prominent figure in Boston politics known for her advocacy work and commitment to social justice. As both a city councilor and now as mayor of Boston, she has been an active voice for community empowerment and against bureaucratic inertia that hinders positive change. Her words underscore the challenges faced by those striving for reform within complex governmental structures where accountability is often elusive.