" What’s disgusting about genetic modification of food? I speculate that many people have an immediate, intuitive sense that what’s healthy is what’s ‘natural,’ and that efforts to tamper with nature will inevitably unleash serious risks – so-called Frankenfoods. The problem with that speculation is that it’s flat-out wrong. "
- Cass Sunstein

In the statement, Cass Sunstein discusses a common aversion people have towards genetically modified foods. He suggests that many individuals immediately feel uneasy about such modifications because they believe that anything natural must be better and safer than something altered or created through human intervention. This unease stems from an intuitive fear of unforeseen risks associated with tampering with nature, often referred to as the creation of "Frankenfoods."

Sunstein's statement delves deeper into why this perspective is flawed. He argues that the idea of what is natural being inherently safe and beneficial is not accurate or well-supported by scientific evidence. The belief in the superiority of naturally occurring processes can overlook significant benefits and advancements made possible through genetic modification, such as increased crop resilience to diseases or harsh climates. By dismissing these modifications outright due to a fear of tampering with nature, people may miss out on important innovations that could greatly benefit society.

Cass Sunstein is a prominent legal scholar known for his work in the fields of behavioral economics and law. He has written extensively about how individuals' intuitive judgments can often lead them astray when it comes to making rational decisions, particularly in areas like public policy and environmental regulation. His expertise spans across various disciplines, allowing him to offer insights that bridge different academic fields and practical applications.