" The print magazine and print journalism industry is obviously in a great deal of trouble, and one of the things that happened when this business started to give way to the Internet and to broadcast television is that a lot of organizations started cutting specifically investigative journalism and they also started cutting fact-checkers. "
- Matt Taibbi

The statement highlights a significant issue within traditional media industries such as print magazines and journalism, noting that these fields are facing considerable challenges due to the rise of digital platforms like the internet and broadcast television. As businesses adapt to this shift, there has been a tendency to reduce funding for investigative journalism and fact-checking roles.

On a deeper level, the quote underscores broader societal changes brought about by technological advancements. The transition from print media to digital formats not only affects how information is consumed but also influences what kind of content is produced. Investigative journalism often requires significant time, resources, and expertise to uncover truths behind complex stories, making it costly for companies under financial strain. Consequently, the reduction in investigative reporting can lead to a less informed public, as fewer resources are dedicated to uncovering hidden truths and verifying information. This shift poses serious questions about media accountability and the reliability of news sources in an era dominated by instant access to information through digital platforms.

Matt Taibbi is a renowned American journalist known for his work on political satire and investigative journalism. He has written extensively about economic injustice, corporate malfeasance, and politics, contributing pieces to Rolling Stone and The Intercept. His insights into the current state of media are based on years of experience in uncovering and reporting on some of the most significant issues affecting society today.