In essence, the speaker is pointing out that according to the Constitution, there exists a specific process called impeachment which can be used to address misconduct by judges. However, this procedure requires at least 100 members of parliament to initiate and has proven ineffective in practice.
The deeper meaning of the statement highlights the structural challenges within the legal system regarding judicial oversight and accountability. The speaker suggests that while there are mechanisms theoretically in place to handle judicial misbehavior, these mechanisms are so cumbersome and rarely utilized that they fail to serve their intended purpose effectively. This implies a potential gap between theoretical constitutional provisions and practical governance realities, leaving room for misconduct by judges to go unchecked due to the impracticality of enforcing such measures.
Prashant Bhushan, an Indian lawyer and activist, is known for his advocacy on various social and political issues in India. He frequently criticizes judicial practices and systemic flaws within the country's legal framework. His insights often reflect concerns about accountability and transparency in governance, making him a prominent voice in discussions regarding constitutional law and judicial conduct.
