The quote suggests that measures intended to enforce certain international agreements have been significantly weakened over time. Specifically, it highlights the Covenant concerning civil and political rights as an example where implementation has become more permissive or optional rather than mandatory.
This statement goes beyond a simple observation of weakening enforcement mechanisms; it raises questions about the integrity and effectiveness of global governance structures. The idea that fundamental rights, which are supposed to be non-negotiable, could become subject to discretionary application is troubling. It implies that states might choose not to adhere strictly to these international agreements based on their own interests or political considerations, thereby undermining the very purpose of such covenants—namely, to protect and promote human rights universally.
Rene Cassin, the author of this quote, was a French jurist who played a pivotal role in drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. He received the Nobel Peace Prize for his work in 1968 and is known for his contributions to international law and human rights advocacy. His perspective on the weakening of these covenants underscores the challenges faced by global governance frameworks as they attempt to uphold standards across different national contexts and political landscapes.
