" Researchers have been looking for biomarkers of age for a long time and have failed. People sell tests out there to measure your biological age, and none of them work. There’s no evidence that you can measure biological age with any reliability. "
- S. Jay Olshansky

In simple terms, this statement suggests that scientists have been trying for a long time to find biological indicators—known as biomarkers—that can accurately measure a person's age beyond just their birth date or physical appearance. These researchers believe such markers could provide insights into the body’s true physiological state relative to its chronological age. However, according to S. Jay Olshansky, these efforts have not been successful, and there is no reliable method currently available on the market for measuring biological age.

The deeper meaning of this quote reflects broader skepticism within the scientific community about the validity and reliability of commercially marketed tests that claim to measure an individual's "biological age." These tests often promise insights into aging processes and potential longevity but lack rigorous validation or evidence supporting their effectiveness. Olshansky’s statement highlights the need for caution when evaluating claims made by such companies and underscores the importance of scientific rigor in research and development. It also emphasizes that despite ongoing advancements, significant challenges remain in accurately quantifying biological aging.

S. Jay Olshansky is a well-known longevity researcher and professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. He specializes in the study of human aging and mortality patterns, contributing significantly to our understanding of how demographic factors influence lifespan. His work often critiques exaggerated or unsupported claims about anti-aging interventions and the measurement of biological age, making him an authoritative voice on these topics within academic circles and beyond.