" Perhaps you should say there should be mandatory retirement even of members of the court, members of the federal judiciary. I’m sure there can be questions about whether one does as good work when you get into your – you know, I’m 67. "
- William Rehnquist

In the quote under discussion, William Rehnquist suggests that there might be a need for mandatory retirement age policies even for members of the court and federal judiciary. He expresses his concerns about whether one's work quality remains at its peak throughout their entire career, especially as they reach an advanced age.

Rehnquist’s statement touches on broader issues related to aging in professional settings and the balance between experience and capability. The suggestion implies a consideration of the point where an individual's accumulated wisdom might be outweighed by diminished physical or cognitive abilities that come with advancing age. This reflects a nuanced view on how institutions can ensure they are staffed by individuals who can perform their roles effectively, regardless of tenure. It also prompts reflection on whether longevity in a position should always be seen as a virtue, particularly in high-stakes roles like those within the judiciary.

William Rehnquist was an American lawyer and jurist who served as the 16th Chief Justice of the United States from 1986 until his death in 2005. He had previously been an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court for nearly two decades before becoming Chief Justice, making him a prominent figure in American legal history. His insights often reflect thoughtful considerations about the dynamics and challenges within the judicial system.