In simple terms, the statement suggests that no constitution can be perfectly balanced or flawless. Instead, what's essential is that it should be widely accepted as both fair and practical. This means that while a constitution might not be without flaws, its overall acceptance by society is crucial for its effectiveness.
The deeper meaning of this quote reflects on the nature of political systems and governance. It implies that perfection in lawmaking or constitutional design is an unattainable ideal. Instead, what matters most is how well these laws serve their intended purpose and whether they are accepted by those who must live under them. This acceptance hinges not only on fairness but also on usability; a constitution should be practical enough to address the needs of its citizens effectively. This perspective challenges the notion that legal frameworks need to be flawless or symmetrical, emphasizing instead adaptability and broad societal support.
The quote is attributed to Ferdinand Mount, an English journalist, historian, and author known for his writings on political history and conservative thought in Britain. His work often explores the complexities of governance and the evolution of political systems over time.
