When discussing movies, it’s common to consider political views as a factor that influences their quality or reception. However, Roger Ebert suggests otherwise. He argues that the merit of a film should be judged on its own merits rather than the political leanings it might represent.
Ebert's statement delves deeper into the essence of filmmaking and criticism. It posits that evaluating a movie based solely on its political stance can overshadow other crucial elements such as storytelling, direction, acting, cinematography, and overall impact on the audience. While viewers may have personal opinions about the politics portrayed in a film, they should not let this cloud their judgment of the artistic value or craftsmanship involved. This perspective encourages a more nuanced approach to movie appreciation by focusing on how well a film engages its audience regardless of ideological biases.
Roger Ebert, an American film critic and author, is widely recognized for his influential role in shaping public opinion about movies through his reviews in the Chicago Sun-Times and later on his television show "Siskel & Ebert." Known for his deep insights into cinema, he remains one of the most respected voices in film criticism.
