In simple terms, the statement reflects a legal philosophy and self-assurance. It conveys that the speaker identifies with a particular method of interpreting laws but does so while asserting that this approach is rational and grounded in reason rather than being seen as eccentric or extreme.
The deeper meaning behind the quote delves into the judicial interpretation methodology known as originalism and textualism. Originalists believe in adhering strictly to the text and intent of the Constitution when making decisions, arguing for a conservative reading of legal documents based on their historical context. The speaker is positioning themselves against being labeled as radical or unreasonable by those who may oppose this approach. By describing himself as not a "nut," he effectively dismisses any critique that might come from those who view originalism and textualism as overly rigid or out of touch with modern interpretations.
This quote is attributed to Antonin Scalia, a prominent American jurist who served as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court of the United States. Known for his sharp wit and conservative legal philosophy, Scalia was influential in shaping contemporary debates around constitutional interpretation and the role of judges in interpreting laws. His stance on originalism and textualism emphasized sticking closely to the text and historical context of legal documents rather than adapting them to current societal norms or personal beliefs.
