" If the court strikes down the Defense of Marriage Act, is that a ‘liberal’ result enabling gay couples married in states where gay marriage is legal to enjoy the same economic advantages that federal laws now grant to straight couples? Or is it a ‘conservative’ ruling, limiting the federal government’s ability to override state power? "
- Jeff Greenfield

In simple terms, the quote discusses how a court decision could affect same-sex couples who are legally married in certain states within the United States but face limitations under federal law due to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The speaker questions whether overturning DOMA would be seen as a liberal or conservative move based on its impact and implications.

The deeper meaning of this quote revolves around the complex interplay between state and federal powers in matters of marriage recognition. Jeff Greenfield is highlighting how an interpretation that upholds individual states' rights to legalize same-sex marriage could be viewed as both a progressive stance for promoting equality and a conservative stance for defending states’ autonomy against overreach by the federal government. This nuanced perspective underscores the multifaceted nature of legal decisions and their interpretations within American political discourse.

Jeff Greenfield is an accomplished journalist known for his work in television, radio, and print media. He has written extensively on politics, law, and social issues, contributing to a wide range of publications and appearing frequently as a commentator. His quote reflects his broad experience and insight into the intricacies of legal and political debates in the United States.