In simple terms, this statement argues that a particular principle is not supported by the Constitution but rather explicitly rejected by it. The speaker believes there is clear evidence within the document's framework that contradicts any notion of endorsing such an idea.
On a deeper level, the quote suggests a significant divergence in how one interprets the Constitution and its foundational principles. By stating that the Constitution "altogether excludes" a certain principle, Seward implies a rigorous interpretation of constitutional law, emphasizing that there are definitive clauses or implications within the text that preclude any other conclusion. This perspective underscores the importance of strict adherence to the original intent and textual integrity of legal documents, rather than broader interpretations based on evolving societal standards. It also highlights the intricate nature of constitutional debates where different viewpoints can fundamentally reshape understandings of a nation's foundational laws.
William H. Seward was a prominent American statesman who served in various governmental roles including Secretary of State under Presidents Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Johnson. Known for his strong anti-slavery stance, he played a crucial role in the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment and advocated for a robust foreign policy. His quote reflects not only his legal expertise but also his commitment to interpreting the Constitution as a bulwark against certain ideas or practices that he deemed contrary to American values and principles.
