" I found it amazing people can think that art must be connected to religion. Religion may give art themes, but there would still be art without religion. Bach is not proof that art exists. "
- Michel Onfray

Michel Onfray's statement reflects a perspective on the relationship between art and religion. He suggests that while religious themes have often inspired artists, including composers like Bach, this connection does not define or limit what art can be. Essentially, Onfray argues that art has its own intrinsic value and can exist independently of religious contexts.

The deeper meaning behind his statement touches upon the autonomy and versatility of artistic expression. By asserting that art would still thrive even without religion as a source of inspiration, Onfray emphasizes the broad range of human experiences and emotions that can fuel creativity. This view encourages a broader understanding of what constitutes valid subject matter for artists, suggesting that secular themes or personal explorations are equally capable of generating profound artistic works. Furthermore, by mentioning Bach but immediately following with the idea that his existence does not prove the necessity of religion for art, Onfray challenges the notion that religious influence is essential to defining art’s significance.

Michel Onfray is a French philosopher and author known for his provocative views on various subjects, including philosophy, ethics, and politics. He has written extensively about the importance of secular humanism and often critiques traditional philosophical frameworks, especially those influenced by religion or institutional authority. His work frequently explores themes of individual freedom and the rejection of dogmatic thinking, aligning closely with his statement on the independence of art from religious influence.