" I don’t care if Facebook’s valuation goes to one gillion. It can go so high we have to make up numbers. It is still not a bubble because there is still not another Facebook in the pipeline. "
- Sarah Lacy

In the given statement, Sarah Lacy expresses her view on the valuation of Facebook by suggesting that even if its worth climbs astronomically high, it still doesn't qualify as a bubble because no other company can match its unique capabilities and market position. Essentially, she believes that while the stock price might seem inflated, there's nothing unsustainable about it as long as Facebook remains unparalleled in its industry.

The deeper meaning of Lacy’s quote lies in her critique of traditional financial analysis methods, particularly those used to identify economic bubbles. She argues that valuing a company solely based on its market capitalization without considering the uniqueness and irreplaceability of its services or products can be misleading. Her statement suggests that if there is no viable competitor on the horizon capable of replicating Facebook's success, the high valuation might actually reflect the true value rather than an inflated bubble prone to bursting. This perspective challenges conventional wisdom about market bubbles by introducing a qualitative aspect alongside quantitative measures.

Sarah Lacy is a well-known American journalist and entrepreneur who has built a reputation for insightful commentary on technology startups and venture capital industries. She founded PandoDaily, a website focused on the tech startup community, and has been recognized for her contributions to covering Silicon Valley's innovative landscape. Her observations often provide fresh insights into the dynamics of emerging markets and the valuation of tech companies.