In simple terms, this quote suggests that a poem which strictly adheres to its own internal rules might fail to meet broader standards of taste and judgment, potentially resulting in it being seen as subpar or lacking quality. The statement implies a tension between the inherent logic governing poetic creation and external criteria used to evaluate such works.
The deeper meaning of Ammons' words touches on the complexities involved in assessing artistic merit. It highlights that while internal consistency within a poem is important for its structural integrity, it may not be sufficient to ensure the piece resonates with readers or meets established standards of literary quality. This idea challenges conventional approaches to evaluating poetry and suggests that there might be intrinsic limits to objective measures when it comes to art's subjective nature. Additionally, it raises questions about how much a poem should conform to existing rules versus breaking new ground, thereby adding nuance to the debate on innovation versus tradition in creative endeavors.
A. R. Ammons was an influential American poet known for his free-form and experimental style during the latter half of the 20th century. His work often explored themes of nature, science, and philosophy, reflecting a deep curiosity about the world around him. Through poems like "Corson's Inlet" and "Collected Poems: 1951-1971," Ammons contributed significantly to modern American poetry by challenging conventional forms and pushing the boundaries of poetic expression.
